Canon VS Nikon Vs The World Photo Battle!
Think your camera is better that the rest? Well here is your chance to prove it! One photo per post to back up your boast. Keep it fun 
Nikon is better because a white lens would of scared him off
D300

Click on photo for EXIF. But as far as equipment details:
Canon 5D Mark II
Canon EF 85mm f/1.2L II USM
natural light (no flash nor strobe)
While not nearly as impressive as the image posted by ocabj.... Aerial Lift Bridge in Duluth, MN. Shot in late November of this year with a Canon 7d. 5sec exposure while camera was sitting on the corner of a 1" steel railing on the lake shore (with me hovering over it to make sure it didn't go for a swim).

Camera Maker: Canon
Camera Model: Canon EOS DIGITAL REBEL XSi
Image Date: 2010:08:31 12:46:37
Focal Length: 50.0mm
Aperture: f/2.8
Exposure Time: 0.020 s (1/50)
ISO equiv: 400
Exposure Bias: none
Exposure Mode: Manual
White Balance: Auto
Flash Fired: No
Color Space: sRGB
OK, I'll be serious...
This was snapped yesterday for a guy buying this rifle. Shot with no special set-up, Canon 40D using green box auto settings my Speedlight 380EX and either my Tamron 10-24 or 28-75 lens... fuck if I can remember!

Oh and I was pissed... like I am now!


So far Cannon is kicking butt.
Nikon D90 staight out of the box
(although I like both)

Nikon FTMFW!

one more for a Nikon boost

Canon.
Just one?
michael.gulledge, on Flickr
Canon 30d
The outdated and antiquated Nikon D100, Nikkor 70-200VR f/2.8

Dude I hope you had a VERY long zoom!
Originally Posted By HiramRanger:
Dude I hope you had a VERY long zoom!
Nikkor 70-200mm lens. Pic taken at 95mm, no cropping.
you bastard! you got to meet Sarah Palin! luuuuuucky!

Originally Posted By Apollos:
you bastard! you got to meet Sarah Palin! luuuuuucky!

Yup ... my two minutes with the royalty of Alaska. I had two minutes to get my stuff set, take pictures and get out.
My website hasn't been updated in probably about a year so it's not all that accurate.
ETA: (Trying to keep one per post)
Canon

You can post as many photos you want but one per post. Just think it will look neat.
Nikon!
D300, f/5 @ 200 mm, 1/100, ISO 400 Lime Rock Park Ct

Originally Posted By Koi:
You can post as many photos you want but one per post. Just think it will look neat.
Cool. I edited above to correct it.
Shitty Nikon D2Hs:
(The grain on that camera is horrendous)
Nikon D500

You'll have to right-click and view image as ARFCOM seems to resize the photos.
Canon 7D with 100-400L
For the animal inclined, Canon 40D with either a 100-400L or 80-200L (can't remember which one I took to the zoo that day)
Again, gotta right click and view image to see it in full resolution.
Maybe not my best, but one of my favorites. Nikin D3100 with the kit 18-55.
VW Commercial Guy/
Representin' Nikon, jah... /VW Commercial Guy
Edit - forgot the info. Nikon D70, Nikkor 18-70mm at 48mm, f/4.5, 1/50s. Handheld.

Yeah, I know it's over-saturated and has some blown highlights. But I like it. First attempt at a silhouette photo. (Once I find all of my back-up drives this is one I really want to see if I can improve with the recent photo editors.)
Camera Maker: Canon
Camera Model: Canon EOS 20D
Lens: 100.0-400.0 mm
Image Date: 2009-06-13 14:07:41 -0400
Focal Length: 400.0mm
Aperture: f/7.1
Exposure Time: 0.0025 s (1/400)
ISO equiv: 400
Exposure Bias: none
Metering Mode: Matrix
Exposure: program (Auto)
White Balance: Auto
Flash Fired: No (Manual)
Color Space: Adobe RGB (1998)
Photographer: unknown
Then again its a 4MP 10 year old body...
Originally Posted By DigDug:
Then again its a 4MP 10 year old body...
Eta; The sensor apparently was the same as the D2H, which being two years old is sad. I didn't buy the thing. I'm pushing for a move to Canon, but we're bought in on glass... The 1DII was a similar time frame but was much better.
The D3 is pretty awesome. Better than the top end Canon bodies.
2005-2008 it was in the line. It's not bad in daylight, but hit 800 ISO and it's useless. I really would say the Rebel XT would perform better.
Nikon D700
AF-S VR Micro-NIKKOR 105mm f/2.8G IF-ED
On camera flash: command mode
SB-600 off camera at frame left
jpg SOOC
exif data
full size image
Originally Posted By Penguin_101:
Originally Posted By DigDug:
Then again its a 4MP 10 year old body...
Eta; The sensor apparently was the same as the D2H, which being two years old is sad. I didn't buy the thing. I'm pushing for a move to Canon, but we're bought in on glass... The 1DII was a similar time frame but was much better.
The D3 is pretty awesome. Better than the top end Canon bodies.
2005-2008 it was in the line. It's not bad in daylight, but hit 800 ISO and it's useless. I really would say the Rebel XT would perform better.
Yeah, the D3s and D3x pretty much stomps anything Canon has right now. The number of pros switching sure shows a trend.
Edit: and OP, it's spelled "CANON"
Canon 50D 17-40L Near Crested Butte, Co
I kind of like this one for some reason. Canon 50D 17-40L.

Originally Posted By fishkiller98579:
Camera Maker: Canon
Camera Model: Canon EOS 20D
Lens: 100.0-400.0 mm
Image Date: 2009-06-13 14:07:41 -0400
Focal Length: 400.0mm
Aperture: f/7.1
Exposure Time: 0.0025 s (1/400)
ISO equiv: 400
Exposure Bias: none
Metering Mode: Matrix
Exposure: program (Auto)
White Balance: Auto
Flash Fired: No (Manual)
Color Space: Adobe RGB (1998)
Photographer: unknown
Thanks for pulling up the EXIF data. I didn't realize it was that long ago back when I owned my 20D.
I win

Nikon D5000 with the kit lens.

Click on photo for EXIF.
But equipment information is: Canon 5D Mark II with Canon EF 70-200 f/2.8L IS II USM, single light - Alien Bees B1600 with a 47" octabox triggered by PocketWizard
Some classic "heavy metal' for ya...
Nikon D70, 18-70mm at 25mm, f/8 at 1/100s, iso 200, supported on a monopod.
From the 1st Cavalry Division Museum at Ft Hood, TX - some interesting history at the various museums on post. Good way to spend a day if you are into military history and are in the Central Texas area.
Early before work with my old Nikon D70s
On tripod.
Another one for Canon.
Using the 40d and 70-200mm

Canon 7d, 70-200 f/4L, ISO400, f4, 1/1600, 126mm

Dinner pic from a couple weeks ago
50mm f/1.2 AIS
Nikon D40
Nikon D40
105mm f/2.5 P.C. pre-AI
Nikon D40
18-55mm kit lens
Kodak DCS 420C (1.5 MP)
28mm f/2.8 AIS
Canon 7d

Here's a little d90 for you:
D90, SB600 off camera around 4:00 bouncing up and over
50mm 1.8, probably on a 2x tele
You can pull the rest of the info from the exif
More d90 representin'
This one was most likely the 18-105 kit lens, with the SB600 on camera, bouncing upward. Photobucket kindly stripped the EXIF data so I'm guessing here.
Originally Posted By 30Caliber:
Kodak DCS 420C (1.5 MP)

Originally Posted By Penguin_101:
Originally Posted By 30Caliber:
Kodak DCS 420C (1.5 MP)

Amazing how people get caught up in the number of megapixels but to take nice photos you don't need it in most cases.
Don't assume the camera with higher MP is better now a days.