|
|
Posted: 4/18/2012 9:59:56 PM
THE IMAGE ABOVE IS A PAID ADVERTISEMENT |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/18/2012 10:03:28 PM
my lgs has stripped factory lmt sbr lowers for $200 ea
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/18/2012 10:08:14 PM
Seems it would be cheaper to buy a stripped lower and just SBR it yourself.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/19/2012 12:26:32 AM
You cannot buy a stripped SBR lower. It's an oxymoron per the definition of "short barreled rifle". NFA Branch will reject your application.
You can buy a stripped lower receiver and Form 1 it into an SBR. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/19/2012 6:44:36 PM
[Last Edit: 4/19/2012 6:46:36 PM by DaBeamz]
I haven't seen any stripped SBR lowers for sale around here before.
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/19/2012 9:14:56 PM
this is a new one.....
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/20/2012 1:13:50 AM
Originally Posted By Homeinvader:
You cannot buy a stripped SBR lower. It's an oxymoron per the definition of "short barreled rifle". NFA Branch will reject your application. You can buy a stripped lower receiver and Form 1 it into an SBR. how about a lower on a form 4 that doesnt have a lpk installed? done to save end user hassle of having lower engraved. |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/20/2012 1:49:39 AM
Originally Posted By netwt12:
Originally Posted By Homeinvader:
You cannot buy a stripped SBR lower. It's an oxymoron per the definition of "short barreled rifle". NFA Branch will reject your application. You can buy a stripped lower receiver and Form 1 it into an SBR. how about a lower on a form 4 that doesnt have a lpk installed? done to save end user hassle of having lower engraved. If there's no short upper attached, it's not an SBR. Several manufacturers got in trouble for sending off F2's for stripped lowers and selling them as "SBR" lowers. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/20/2012 9:38:21 AM
Originally Posted By SamuelH:
Ok, so I recently contracted the glorious BRD that has evolved into the SBR strain. So what would be the going range for an SBR registered reciever from a local gun shop? I'm kind of thinking a PSA lower, do the paper work, have it engraved and wait will be cheaper. As was said, your going to have to buy a complete rifle as an SBR. Either that or roll your own like everyone else does :) |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/20/2012 9:40:36 AM
[Last Edit: 4/20/2012 10:01:29 AM by TeeRex]
If you want one on a form 4, you'll have the easiest time buying a complete gun.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/20/2012 9:53:26 AM
You can buy stripped SBR lowers. Several companies including this very website sell them. As long as the manufacturer, transferring dealer, and end buyer all have an SBR upper, it's all good.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/20/2012 10:33:04 AM
[Last Edit: 4/20/2012 10:33:53 AM by Homeinvader]
Originally Posted By JoshAston:
You can buy stripped SBR lowers. Several companies including this very website sell them. As long as the manufacturer, transferring dealer, and end buyer all have an SBR upper, it's all good. There is so much to worry about with the slippery scenario you're suggesting. Everyone having an SBR upper along the way simply means there is possession of an SBR at each stop, but it is still transferring stripped. The transfer is not the Form 4, but the actual physical handing of the firearm to the new owner and if it is stripped at this time, then there is no transfer of an SBR. I would also be worried of perjury violations for gaming the system like this. You are signing under penalties of perjury that an actual SBR of a certain configuration is being transferred to a new owner. What is actually happening is contrary to this and within your knowledge. Very dangerous. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/20/2012 12:27:29 PM
ARFCom and AGP are both doing it with the blessing of the ATF.
Originally Posted By Homeinvader: Originally Posted By JoshAston: You can buy stripped SBR lowers. Several companies including this very website sell them. As long as the manufacturer, transferring dealer, and end buyer all have an SBR upper, it's all good. There is so much to worry about with the slippery scenario you're suggesting. Everyone having an SBR upper along the way simply means there is possession of an SBR at each stop, but it is still transferring stripped. The transfer is not the Form 4, but the actual physical handing of the firearm to the new owner and if it is stripped at this time, then there is no transfer of an SBR. I would also be worried of perjury violations for gaming the system like this. You are signing under penalties of perjury that an actual SBR of a certain configuration is being transferred to a new owner. What is actually happening is contrary to this and within your knowledge. Very dangerous. |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/20/2012 1:36:35 PM
[Last Edit: 4/20/2012 2:33:14 PM by Homeinvader]
Originally Posted By JoshAston:
ARFCom and AGP are both doing it with the blessing of the ATF. Originally Posted By Homeinvader:
Originally Posted By JoshAston:
You can buy stripped SBR lowers. Several companies including this very website sell them. As long as the manufacturer, transferring dealer, and end buyer all have an SBR upper, it's all good. There is so much to worry about with the slippery scenario you're suggesting. Everyone having an SBR upper along the way simply means there is possession of an SBR at each stop, but it is still transferring stripped. The transfer is not the Form 4, but the actual physical handing of the firearm to the new owner and if it is stripped at this time, then there is no transfer of an SBR. I would also be worried of perjury violations for gaming the system like this. You are signing under penalties of perjury that an actual SBR of a certain configuration is being transferred to a new owner. What is actually happening is contrary to this and within your knowledge. Very dangerous. That's not what AGP is doing. You have to send them your SBR upper, they transfer a complete rifle to you or your dealer. Very different scenario. And I'm not aware that arfcom is an SOT... |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/20/2012 7:36:53 PM
Originally Posted By Homeinvader: That's not what AGP is doing. You have to send them your SBR upper, they transfer a complete rifle to you or your dealer. Very different scenario. And I'm not aware that arfcom is an SOT... My mistake on AGP then. And yes ARFCom is an SOT. I've got an SBR lower awaiting approval right now. Several members already have theirs. |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/21/2012 12:35:28 AM
Originally Posted By JoshAston: And yes ARFCom is an SOT. I've got an SBR lower awaiting approval right now. Last time this came up, ARFCOM was unable to explain how it was doing this legally. Did lower xfer to your dealer with an upper? What BBL length was listed on the F3 to you dealer? |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/21/2012 12:53:16 AM
Originally Posted By RenegadeX: Originally Posted By JoshAston: And yes ARFCom is an SOT. I've got an SBR lower awaiting approval right now. Last time this came up, ARFCOM was unable to explain how it was doing this legally. Did lower xfer to your dealer with an upper? No What BBL length was listed on the F3 to you dealer? 10.5" |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/21/2012 1:27:33 AM
Originally Posted By JoshAston:
Originally Posted By RenegadeX:
Originally Posted By JoshAston:
And yes ARFCom is an SOT. I've got an SBR lower awaiting approval right now. Last time this came up, ARFCOM was unable to explain how it was doing this legally. Did lower xfer to your dealer with an upper? No What BBL length was listed on the F3 to you dealer? 10.5" And therein lies the trouble. If the SBR was shipped to the dealer in a stripped configuration, then an "SBR" was not transferred. That's one problem. If the signed Form 3 indicated the transferring SBR had a 10.5" barrel and the true intention -and resultant action- was to physically transfer a money-saving stripped lower, then there is a serious legal issue here. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/21/2012 11:26:33 AM
Originally Posted By JoshAston: Originally Posted By RenegadeX: Originally Posted By JoshAston: And yes ARFCom is an SOT. I've got an SBR lower awaiting approval right now. Last time this came up, ARFCOM was unable to explain how it was doing this legally. Did lower xfer to your dealer with an upper? No What BBL length was listed on the F3 to you dealer? 10.5" So somebody falsified a Form 3 by claiming a it had a BBL when it did not. Here is what the Form 3 instructions say about falsifying forms: ![]() So your Lower is now subject to confiscation. Probably will not happen, but if I were you I would not lie on the Form 4 from dealer to you. Slap a <16 upper on it and fill out the Form 4 based on that. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/21/2012 12:20:08 PM
[Last Edit: 4/21/2012 1:03:15 PM by eric496]
A FFL here in NH told me he is planning to get his SOT so he can sell SBR lowers. Maybe he did already because this conversation happened months ago and I haven't talked to him about it since.
According to him, he got the procedure from ATF directly. First, he goes through the process of registering the lowers as SBR, assigns them a barrel length, overall length, and engraves them. At the time a Form 4 is filled out and signed to transfer them to the buyer, he must install an upper with the appropriate length barrel. I don't know if that means installing the take down pins or just holding it in place. Or maybe they must be complete lowers, I don't remember exactly. After the paperwork is signed, the upper may be removed. When the paperwork comes back, the buyer picks up the lower only. Then the buyer is to first assemble it with the listed barrel length. After that the owner is free to change barrel lengths, just like any other SBR. As I said above, this conversation was months ago so I may be missing a detail or two. It can be done legally and it involves installing an upper and maybe threading on a stock assy finger tight while the paperwork is signed. The advantage of this? Some people do not want their name engraved on the lower. Disclaimer: I am not a lawyer, this is not legal advice, and I have not purchased a SBR this way. |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/21/2012 1:36:32 PM
I have to go over there to take possesion of a reciever he is transfering for me so when I go back over there I will enquire about the "SBR"reciever in question.
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/21/2012 7:50:05 PM
Originally Posted By RenegadeX: So somebody falsified a Form 3 by claiming a it had a BBL when it did not. Here is what the Form 3 instructions say about falsifying forms: http://i839.photobucket.com/albums/zz314/Umbrarian/BATFE/Form3PerjuryPenatlies.png So your Lower is now subject to confiscation. Probably will not happen, but if I were you I would not lie on the Form 4 from dealer to you. Slap a <16 upper on it and fill out the Form 4 based on that. No, just no. As explained above, it's legal. Is it a loophole, yes. But it's still legal. The barrel does not have to stay on the lower at all times for it to be an SBR. It only has to be in possession. If it did have to be installed at all times, you'd have to re-register your SBR every time you took the upper off to switch it out with another one. The sum of the parts make the weapon even when they are not assembled. This is the same reason so many people are all in a wad over constructive intent or possession or whatever the latest term is. If you have the parts to make an SBR, then you have an SBR, regardless of whether or not it's assembled. http://www.ar15.com/archive/topic.html?b=6&f=17&t=274328 ORIGINALLY POSTED BY: tony_k Here's the deal: Licensed 07/02 FFL/SOT manufacturers do not file Form 1s to apply to make an SBR. Instead, they use an entirely different form (Form 2) and a different ATF process. The Form 2 末 you can download a .pdf of it at http://www.atf.gov/forms/pdfs/f53202.pdf is not a request to make an NFA item 末 instead, it is a notification of NFA items which have already been manufactured, reactivated or imported. On Line 9, where the 07/02 must sign, the form states: UNDER PENALTIES OF PERJURY, I DECLARE that I have examined this notice of firearms manufactured, reactivated or imported and, to the best of my knowledge and belief, it is true, correct and complete. Notice the past tense 末 the Form 2 is notification of completion of manufacture. A Short-Barrelled Rifle is defined in federal law as a shoulder-fired gun with a barrel of under 16" and an overall length of under 26". Until it is a complete, assembled firearm, it cannot meet that definition 末 it's just a pile of parts. Federal law draws a distinction between different classes of NFA 末 the definition of a machine gun includes the bare receiver and/or the parts which permit full-auto fire. This does not apply to SBRs, SBS's, AOWs 末 the receivers alone are Title 1, the parts are just unregulated parts. SBRs, SBS's and AOWs do not become subject to the National Firearms Act until they are assembled in NFA configuration. It is completely legal for an 07/02 to assemble a complete firearm in SBR configuration, register it via a Form 2, then disassemble it and sell the stripped receiver as a registered SBR. This is, I hope, what 07/02s are doing. But selling a never-assembled virgin receiver as an SBR does not meet federal laws, IMHO, because if it has never been manufactured as an SBR, the Form 2 Registration is not valid. FWIW. YMMV. |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/23/2012 4:20:36 PM
Originally Posted By JoshAston: Originally Posted By RenegadeX: So somebody falsified a Form 3 by claiming a it had a BBL when it did not. Here is what the Form 3 instructions say about falsifying forms: http://i839.photobucket.com/albums/zz314/Umbrarian/BATFE/Form3PerjuryPenatlies.png So your Lower is now subject to confiscation. Probably will not happen, but if I were you I would not lie on the Form 4 from dealer to you. Slap a <16 upper on it and fill out the Form 4 based on that. No, just no. As explained above, it's legal. Is it a loophole, yes. But it's still legal. There are no loopholes. If the lower xfers without the BBL, then it is just an ordinary lower. The fact that you can "get away with it without anyone knowing" does not make it legal. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/23/2012 7:23:25 PM
Originally Posted By RenegadeX:
Originally Posted By JoshAston:
Originally Posted By RenegadeX:
So somebody falsified a Form 3 by claiming a it had a BBL when it did not. Here is what the Form 3 instructions say about falsifying forms: http://i839.photobucket.com/albums/zz314/Umbrarian/BATFE/Form3PerjuryPenatlies.png So your Lower is now subject to confiscation. Probably will not happen, but if I were you I would not lie on the Form 4 from dealer to you. Slap a <16 upper on it and fill out the Form 4 based on that. No, just no. As explained above, it's legal. Is it a loophole, yes. But it's still legal. There are no loopholes. If the lower xfers without the BBL, then it is just an ordinary lower. The fact that you can "get away with it without anyone knowing" does not make it legal. Big +1. The moment it transfers without the barrel indicated on the Form 3 or Form 4, then you have both an improper NFA transfer and a perjury violation. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/23/2012 8:32:43 PM
This thread is a great example of how stupid gun laws are.
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/23/2012 10:47:53 PM
I agree,bunch of lawyer tricks. So I went to pick up my lower and forgot to ask about the SBR lower, seems my 4473 was held over for further investigation
Originally Posted By KaiK:
This thread is a great example of how stupid gun laws are. |
|
|